Bookbinding and Blathering

Anthony | Cause of death will probably be "stabbed upon making a painful pun"
(Rarely updated) Art blog at http://anthony-butler-art.tumblr.com

butlerbookbinding asked: Is Ursula....A SEAAAAAAAA WITCH? Or a mermaid or siren who realized that there was good money to be made in witchcraft?

thebibliosphere:

Apart from once being the lover of an Empress whose continent sunk beneath the ocean, Ursula has zero association to the sea. And as any witch in Phangs will tell you, there’s little money to be had in the craft.

@ravenclaw-writingdesk asked:​ Ok so since the gods are out, was she named Ursula after the Saint?

There’s certainly been a lot written about her travels.

@habquchdu asked: …Is Ursula the big spoon or the little spoon? (Had to ask.) 

Valid. And she is the big spoon.

And that concludes tonight’s version of the Ursula Guessing Game :P

If I get anymore I will wait and compose them all into one big text post.

I suddenly have this urge to figure out how overhaul a fictional economy so that the hard working and industrious witches (both marine and terrestrial) of your world might make money off of their witchcraft.

cannibalcoalition:

cannibalcoalition:

Spider plant, spider plant

Does some things that spiders can’t.

Clones itself in a pot

Makes the air fresh when it’s not.

I’m… gonna steal this spider plant.

Spider plant, spider plant.

 Friendly cubicle spider plant.

 Kinda like Fieri’s hair 

But takes formaldehyde from the air. 

Look out, i stole a spider plant.

(via thebibliosphere)

whetstonefires:

chiisana-sukima:

fozzie:

howls moving castle: howls vain obsession with beauty is his fatal flaw. this is made extremely clear in numerous circumstances. this is supposed to be the thing you dont like about him

all of us including me: hhgfgh howl … pretty ………

Yeah, he’s sure pretty alright.

But his vanity wasn’t actually his fatal flaw, at least in the movie. It was just a minor charming comic-relief flaw.

His real flaw was refusal to shoulder his responsibility. The beauty of the resolution of HMC, is that by loving each other, the characters all teach each other courage.

in the book, if we’re running up comparisons, howl’s vanity definitely wasn’t his fatal flaw, it was…more of a defense mechanism.

it covers for a number of insecurities, ranging from the childhood self-worth kind to the ‘my ability to feel normal emotions is compromised by having given away my actual physical heart in a magical pact i can’t get out of without killing my asshole friend if at all, and this causes me major identity problems.’

(according to Calcifer he also isn’t actually particularly good-looking under all the cosmetics and hair-care, but Sophie never actually evaluates that so idk.

the first impression he makes, at May Day before she knows he’s Wizard Howl, is ‘dashing’ with a ‘bony, sophisticated face’ and ‘well into his twenties.’ no further details ever come up. his attractiveness is definitely dealt with more as a matter of presentation than of his specific features, tho–like his ability to produce a gorgeous romantic tableau through posture and positioning when courting Actual Lettie–and there’s every indication Sophie wouldn’t be all that interested if she wasn’t attached.)

i didn’t realize the avoidance of responsibility thing made it into the movie! the way he’s half-killing himself…turning into a harpy and…overflying the war…kind of overshadowed it for me i guess. huh, cool.

being a slitherer-outer, as Sophie puts it, is…sort of his flaw, in the book? like, it absolutely is. but it’s also one of his chiefest strengths; it’s how he kept ahead of the Witch’s curse for so long. she had to manipulate Sophie and Michael and threaten Howl’s family in Wales as a distraction to finally catch him up.

(as sophie says in the sequel, “Vices? I’m just describing Howl.”)

this is how flaws often work in dwj’s work, come to think of it. the only fatal traits are the ones the villain relies on to advance their agenda, right up until they push it and/or the people bearing the consequences of it so far they experience overwhelming backlash, and those tend to be of the ‘exploiting/manipulating’ type.

…most notable is that incredibly awful guy who entered the effective field of a poetic-narrative-based reality warping computer he’d imprisoned thousands of years ago, and turned into a dragon.

(via thebibliosphere)

nemothesurvivor:

shanastoryteller:

g-a-y-b-a-c-o-n:

shanastoryteller:

one of the things i really like about los angeles is all the men hanging around with trucks full of produce

the first time i saw one was at home depot, the sun was setting, and i was with a group of friends. and right there, in the middle of the parking lot, was a giant truck filled with pomegranates, so high that he couldn’t possibly drive like that, but it was amazing

i literally stopped in my tracks. i’d never seen so many pomegranates in my life. i took pictures. i was so excited. my friends were laughing at me. people walking by were laughing at me. the guy who had the truck full of pomegranates was laughing at me. but i was thrilled. a truckful of pomegranates just right there, hundreds of them, the same color as the setting sun

maybe it’s weird to romanticize a pile of fruit, but i was thoroughly charmed. 

anyway. i left the bank today, and there was a truck of oranges. so many oranges, piled almost as high as i was tall. the man had cut some of them into slices and put a bowl next the bank entrance. ‘free samples!’ he hollered. i took one. it was firm and sweet and i pulled it off the skin in one motion. i bought a bag for $5, and he studied them before choosing one for me, picking up one bag and then putting it down to grab another. ‘they’re sweet,’ he promised.

there’s something so satisfying about it, about going to cash a check or pick up some nails, and being confronted with a huge pile of brightly colored fruit, a cheerful splash of color against concrete. 

support your local man with a truck full of fruit. they’re sweet. i promise. 

You’ve heard of “The Baker and The Tattoo artist” now get ready for, “The produce delivery guy, and the random ass person that loves FUCKING fruit”

is … is fucking an adjective or a verb here? because that, um, changes things

Is the story about lemons or is the story the lemon?

(via stormandmoonlight)

naamahdarling:
“ naamahdarling:
“ rhube:
“ bastardlybrendan:
“ fuckingrecipes:
“ facts-i-just-made-up:
“ I spent like 15 hours on this.
”
*impressed slow clap*
”
This was ridiculously pleasing to read out loud.
”
This is a legitimately fine poem. I...

naamahdarling:

naamahdarling:

rhube:

bastardlybrendan:

fuckingrecipes:

facts-i-just-made-up:

I spent like 15 hours on this.

*impressed slow clap*

This was ridiculously pleasing to read out loud. 

This is a legitimately fine poem. I say so with my BA in English and Philosophy and my PhD. It’s DAMN HARD to write something like this. Be impressed, yo.

Transcript of poem in screenshot:

First the cracker batter baker bakes a cracker batter batch
then the cracker batter mixer door will open and unlatch
so the batter mixer nozzle can descend onto the patch
where the cracker batter spreads out for the nozzle to attach.

When the cracker mixer nozzle sprays the cracker batter spray
and the cracker batch emulsion lies a-soaking in its haze
then the cracker batter mixer starts to stir up all the glaze
that the final cracker stacker needs to lubricate the way.

Once the cracker stacker handle stacks the cracker batter squares
then the cracker batter’s hardened into double stacks of pairs.
Now the cracker separator breaks the crackers in the stackers
so the wrappers on the stackers fit the finished stacking crackers.

Then they’re distributed to Wal-Mart.

I forgot about this magnificent poem, and you probably did too. Here it is again.

I highly recommend trying to read it aloud, it feels delightful and is almost impossible.

(via stormandmoonlight)

Punisher creator Gerry Conway: Cops using the skull logo are like people using the Confederate flag

tinasheacoates:

agreedt:

What are your thoughts on the Punisher symbol being co-opted by police or the military?

I’ve talked about this in other interviews. To me, it’s disturbing whenever I see authority figures embracing Punisher iconography because the Punisher represents a failure of the Justice system. He’s supposed to indict the collapse of social moral authority and the reality some people can’t depend on institutions like the police or the military to act in a just and capable way.

The vigilante anti-hero is fundamentally a critique of the justice system, an example of social failure, so when cops put Punisher skulls on their cars or members of the military wear Punisher skull patches, they’re basically sides with an enemy of the system. They are embracing an outlaw mentality. Whether you think the Punisher is justified or not, whether you admire his code of ethics, he is an outlaw. He is a criminal. Police should not be embracing a criminal as their symbol.

@ these racist cops: Even the creator of the Punisher is calling yall out lol

@mrbenibo remember that discussion we had on the pervasiveness of it lmao we know exactly what it was rooted in. Same with military folks.

(via darthvaderofmiddle-earth)

brazenbipolar:

image

Why Are Libfems… like she almost got the point, but because of sex posi bullshit she spun it the wrong way. It’s SAD that so many women in kink/BDSM are trying to use it as a bandaid coping mechanism for trauma. It’s sad that the men involved in that scene prey upon women they know are vulnerable. It’s not badass by any means. Hypersexuality as a response to trauma shouldn’t be romanticized.

(via dicksoda)

scarlettweaver:

xxaeris:

officialtheonite:

bitchesofostwick:

me: okay time to jump into the action scene

me: don’t say it

me: don’t say it

me: don’t say it

me: don’t say it

me: don’t say it

me: don’t say it

me: don’t say it

me: don’t say it

me: … “SUDDENLY”

My go-to fixes for this:

  1. but before [Character] could [verb], ACTION!
  2. [Character] was about to [verb] when ACTION!
  3. but no sooner had [something] than ACTION!
  4. but just as [something boring], ACTION!
  5. BANG!/CRASH!/BOOM! ACTION!
  6. “Character dialogue starting some sentence about–” ACTION!
  7. Character’s internal monologue starting some sentACTION!
  8. Narrator starting some– ACTION!
  9. ACTION!

Why extend your readers the courtesy of a ‘suddenly’ except to vary sentence structure?

One of my go-to fixes is 

“Well, what could go wrong now?” [Character] said. 

As if on cue, ACTION!

My favorite is honestly just …ACTION!

(via darthvaderofmiddle-earth)

aedienmornive:

sainatsukino:

usagiskywalker:

nursephantump:

lsdzeppelin:

I noticed the other day that girls usually adapt to their bfs hobbies like if they enjoy idk surfing the girls will start learning facts about it and buying cute things related to it for them and being so proud of their bf like they’re a star even if they aren’t that great at surfing just out of pure love and joy ….. But men never fucking adapt to their gf’s interests like they can’t possibly care less about makeup for example or they’ll just complain about them taking too long to get ready instead of sharing the passion for it and watching them create something beautiful and being interested in why is it that it makes her feel better to do her makeup. Men are so used to not trying at all fuck that tbh!!!!

yall are just dating the wrong fucking people lmao

Seriously, you ARE dating the wrong people. I work in a makeup store and the sheer amount of guys that are fully engaged in what their girlfriends/wives are doing with makeup surprised me. Yes there’s a lot of guys who scoff and roll their eyes about being in the PRESENCE of makeup, but there’s sooooo many that are consistently engaged, looking at colours wanting to help (even when they’re visibly confused and you can see they want to help but don’t know how). My boyfriend even knows more than I thought just from listening to me talk.

Find better quality guys that take interest in your interests and stop settling for assholes.

the person you’re dating should be your best friend. Not as in, date your best friend, but as in if your partner doesn’t engage with you at the same level as a best friend (or even just a friend), there is something wrong. It’s not long term material.

Couples that act like men and women are ‘opposite’ sides in the relationship game are such a weird concept for me. ‘Oh, we’re married, my wife is basically an obstacle to me getting a nice night out with my friends haha’ or ‘oh my boyfriend doesn’t do any of the housework ahahaha boys am I right?“

like, ?????? you,re not supposed to be on opposite sides, both pulling to get what you want. You’re supposed to be a TEAM. that’s, like, the whole point of a relationship.

Like, not only does my boyfriend know and care about my interests, even the ones I rant about that know bore him a little (and vice versa - I now know a lot about Eve Online and he knows more than he has probably ever wanted to know about star wars fanfiction), he also knows about my day to day stuff. Like, I’ll ask him to do the laundry and he’ll answer “okay but where’s the little net bag you put your bras in so they don’t get stretched in the washer?” because he fucking LISTENED when I bought it and told him what it was for.

like I said. You’re a team, conquering adult life together. That goes for everything, from getting excited and calling him over when I spot a simulator game on sale at the store (even though wtf simulator games I will never get the point of them) to figuring out the most efficient way to keep the living room clean.

*high fives my boyfriend, cartwheels out of the house*

It’s sad because I’ve seen what OP is talking about with my mom, my sister, and my friends. I don’t think people need to love all of one another’s hobbies, but they should make and effort to take an interest. I know that. It all guys are like this, kudos to those of you who really participate in your relationships.

(via saturnabouttomakelove)

We might have misunderstood Hogwarts Houses for years

sandersstudies:

mikkeneko:

somethingtodowithpotter:

I have a theory that the valued quality of each of the four Houses isn’t really about the personality of its students.

The valued quality of each of the four Houses has to do with how they perceive magic.

Stick with me a second: Hogwarts is a school to study magic. Magic as Hogwarts teaches it can be seen as many things: a natural talent, a gift, a weapon, etc.

So how you believe magic should be used will both reflect your personality and change how you handle that power.

“Their daring, nerve, and chivalry set Gryffindors apart,” Gryffindors perceive magic as a weapon. Gryffindors tend to excel in aggressive forms of magic, like offensive and defensive spells, and they are good at dueling. But a true Gryffindor knows that the power is a responsibility, and so they must always use their powers to stand up for what’s right. They are the sword of the righteous, which makes them as good at Defense Against the Dark Arts as they are at combat magic.

Hufflepuffs believe that magic is a gift and that the best gifts are to be given away. Hufflepuffs, “loyal and just,” would naturally abhor the idea of jealously guarding magic or using it to hurt someone else. So Hufflepuffs share their magic to benefit of Muggles, like the Fat Friar, to protect the overlooked, like Newt Scamander with his creatures, or to oppose those who would use magic to torment and bully, like the Hufflepuffs who stood with the DA and the battle of Hogwarts.

Slytherins are the opposite: they believe their magic is a treasure that they have been entrusted to protect. The Slytherin fascination with purity, with advantage, with cunning and secrecy–all of which were perverted by the Death Eaters–comes from the idea that people with magic in their veins have been given something special that it is their duty to protect at all costs. And perhaps they aren’t entirely wrong: power in the wrong hands can be dangerous. And power interfering at will with Muggle affairs is a gross presumption that could turn the course of history. Though the series shows some of the worst that Slytherin can be, “evil,” is not a natural Slytherin tendency. “Cautious,” is.

Ravenclaws believe that magic is an art form, one that is beautiful and should be appreciated and studied for its own sake. If “wit beyond measure is man’s greatest treasure,” then asking what magic is for is useless. It’s more important to immerse oneself in magic for its own sake. Ravenclaws push the boundaries of magic to see if they can, hence Hermione’s spell experiment on the DA coins being dubbed a Ravenclaw quality, but like Luna Lovegood in the pursuit of extraordinary creatures: they can also be content to plumb the depths of what already exists.

So while you can see where personalities will overlap over Houses, perhaps in Sorting we should be asking ourselves less what we think we are and more what we think we believe. 

that’s much more interesting and substantive than “brave, smart, evil, miscellaneous”

No URL because this post came from actual Hogwarts via digital owl.

(via awaitingyourowl)